I recently circulated a petition to start a new interest group within LITA, to be called the Patron Privacy Technologies IG. I’ve submitted the formation petition to the LITA Council, and a vote on the petition is scheduled for early November. I also held an organizational meeting with the co-chairs; I’m really looking forward to what we all can do to help improve how our tools protect patron privacy.
But enough about the IG, let’s talk about the petition! To be specific, let’s talk about when the signatures came in.
I’ve been on Twitter since March of 2009, but a few months ago I made the decision to become much more active there (you see, there was a dearth of cat pictures on Twitter, and I felt it my duty to help do something about it). My first thought was to tweet the link to a Google Form I created for the petition. I did so at 7:20 a.m. Pacific Time on 15 October:
LITA members interested in the @ALA_LITA Patron Privacy Technologies IG – please sign the petition to form the IG: https://t.co/kOggjNSKYi
— Galen Charlton (@gmcharlt@mastodon.social) (@gmcharlt) October 15, 2014
Also, if you are interested in being co-chair of the LITA Patron Privacy Tech IG, please indicate on the petition or drop me a line.
— Galen Charlton (@gmcharlt@mastodon.social) (@gmcharlt) October 15, 2014
Since I wanted to gauge whether there was interest beyond just LITA members, I also posted about the petition on the ALA Think Tank Facebook group at 7:50 a.m. on the 15th.
By the following morning, I had 13 responses: 7 from LITA members, and 6 from non-LITA members. An interest group petition requires 10 signatures from LITA members, so at 8:15 on the 16th, I sent another tweet, which got retweeted by LITA:
Just a few more signatures from LITA members needed for the Patron Privacy IG formation petition: https://t.co/i4mXsJps1p @ALA_LITA
— Galen Charlton (@gmcharlt@mastodon.social) (@gmcharlt) October 16, 2014
By early afternoon, that had gotten me one more signature. I was feeling a bit impatient, so at 2:28 p.m. on the 16th, I sent a message to the LITA-L mailing list.
That opened the floodgates: 10 more signatures from LITA members arrived by the end of the day, and 10 more came in on the 17th. All told, a total of 42 responses to the form were submitted between the 15th and the 23rd.
The petition didn’t ask how the responder found it, but if I make the assumption that most respondents filled out the form shortly after they first heard about it, I arrive at my bit of anecdata: over half of the petition responses were inspired by my post to LITA-L, suggesting that the mailing list remains an effective way of getting the attention of many LITA members.
By the way, the petition form is still up for folks to use if they want to be automatically subscribed to the IG’s mailing list when it gets created.
Reaching LITA members: a datapoint by Galen Charlton is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.