<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Meta Interchange</title>
	<atom:link href="http://galencharlton.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://galencharlton.com/blog</link>
	<description>Libraries, computing, metadata, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Preconference at ALA: Migrating to Open Source Library Systems by Jie Chen</title>
		<link>http://galencharlton.com/blog/?p=62&#038;cpage=1#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Jie Chen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://galencharlton.com/blog/?p=62#comment-412</guid>
		<description>Hello Galen: I really enjoyed the presentations.  Many thanks for doing a great job.  Is it possible to get a copy of the slides for the one presentation you did in the afternoon?  Or are the presentations posted somewhere?  I would love to share the slides with some of my colleagues who could not attend the workshop. Thanks very much!  JC@Loudoun County Public Library.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Galen: I really enjoyed the presentations.  Many thanks for doing a great job.  Is it possible to get a copy of the slides for the one presentation you did in the afternoon?  Or are the presentations posted somewhere?  I would love to share the slides with some of my colleagues who could not attend the workshop. Thanks very much!  JC@Loudoun County Public Library.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Database server disk space usage in Evergreen by Rogan Hamby</title>
		<link>http://galencharlton.com/blog/?p=36&#038;cpage=1#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogan Hamby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://galencharlton.com/blog/?p=36#comment-402</guid>
		<description>Very interesting read.  Although our production system is hosted this kind of look into the back end fascinates me to no end.  I keep thinking about putting together a sort of high end training server just for our staff locally and this is great stuff to chew on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting read.  Although our production system is hosted this kind of look into the back end fascinates me to no end.  I keep thinking about putting together a sort of high end training server just for our staff locally and this is great stuff to chew on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mixed messages by What I Learned Today&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The reality of open source (aka Koha confusions)</title>
		<link>http://galencharlton.com/blog/?p=45&#038;cpage=1#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>What I Learned Today&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The reality of open source (aka Koha confusions)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 01:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://galencharlton.com/blog/?p=45#comment-265</guid>
		<description>[...] their developments integrated into official Koha releases. But in our excitement we seemed to have overlooked something &#8230; But here is where the mixed messages come in: “Harley” is prominently listed on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] their developments integrated into official Koha releases. But in our excitement we seemed to have overlooked something &#8230; But here is where the mixed messages come in: “Harley” is prominently listed on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mixed messages by Chris Cormack</title>
		<link>http://galencharlton.com/blog/?p=45&#038;cpage=1#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Cormack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 22:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://galencharlton.com/blog/?p=45#comment-264</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s probably fair to point out that nearly everything in Koha has been sponsored or contributed by libraries, and that the next official release of Koha will be 3.2.0. It is currently going through rigorous testing (it is on it&#039;s second alpha release) and contains patches from a multitude of vendors, developers and libraries, of which PTFS/Liblime are one. 
While Liblime may not have intended to cause confusion, by persisting to call Harley a release of Koha, and to label the actual releases of Koha, &#039;community version&#039;, they are indeed doing so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s probably fair to point out that nearly everything in Koha has been sponsored or contributed by libraries, and that the next official release of Koha will be 3.2.0. It is currently going through rigorous testing (it is on it&#8217;s second alpha release) and contains patches from a multitude of vendors, developers and libraries, of which PTFS/Liblime are one.<br />
While Liblime may not have intended to cause confusion, by persisting to call Harley a release of Koha, and to label the actual releases of Koha, &#8216;community version&#8217;, they are indeed doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mixed messages by Amy De Groff</title>
		<link>http://galencharlton.com/blog/?p=45&#038;cpage=1#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy De Groff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 22:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://galencharlton.com/blog/?p=45#comment-263</guid>
		<description>LibLime did not intend to suggest that our customer sponsored work is the community version of Koha - (Koha 3.0.5) and we  hope our FAQ  on Harley makes that clear.  We specifically did not use a version number to make sure we did not present a conflict or introduce confusion with the community developed releases.  Our desire in releasing a full functioning, ready to use version of Koha, was to give librarians a chance to see it and use it immediately to gain benefit of significantly more features than in community version 3.05 (December 2009).  We have updated the Koha.org Website to fix the potential confusion - by indicating that 3.05 is the Official Community release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LibLime did not intend to suggest that our customer sponsored work is the community version of Koha &#8211; (Koha 3.0.5) and we  hope our FAQ  on Harley makes that clear.  We specifically did not use a version number to make sure we did not present a conflict or introduce confusion with the community developed releases.  Our desire in releasing a full functioning, ready to use version of Koha, was to give librarians a chance to see it and use it immediately to gain benefit of significantly more features than in community version 3.05 (December 2009).  We have updated the Koha.org Website to fix the potential confusion &#8211; by indicating that 3.05 is the Official Community release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mixed messages by Code hits the wild &#124; Korerorero</title>
		<link>http://galencharlton.com/blog/?p=45&#038;cpage=1#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Code hits the wild &#124; Korerorero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 19:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://galencharlton.com/blog/?p=45#comment-262</guid>
		<description>[...] Some great clarification on Koha releases. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some great clarification on Koha releases. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mixed messages by Lori Ayre</title>
		<link>http://galencharlton.com/blog/?p=45&#038;cpage=1#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori Ayre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 15:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://galencharlton.com/blog/?p=45#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification, Galen.  I&#039;ve been waiting to jump for joy until the other shoe dropped.  Too bad we can&#039;t just jump with wild abandon!  But maybe we&#039;re getting closer.  Thanks to PTFS for releasing the code.  Now fix that language problem and we&#039;ll be all set.  

Well, okay, there&#039;s a couple more things....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification, Galen.  I&#8217;ve been waiting to jump for joy until the other shoe dropped.  Too bad we can&#8217;t just jump with wild abandon!  But maybe we&#8217;re getting closer.  Thanks to PTFS for releasing the code.  Now fix that language problem and we&#8217;ll be all set.  </p>
<p>Well, okay, there&#8217;s a couple more things&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mixed messages by Liz Rea</title>
		<link>http://galencharlton.com/blog/?p=45&#038;cpage=1#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Rea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 15:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://galencharlton.com/blog/?p=45#comment-260</guid>
		<description>I would like to point out that koha.org is no longer the official website of the Koha Library Software project. The Koha Library Software project does not post official releases at koha.org anymore, the reasons why have been stated on the official website: http://koha-community.org/home/.

I agree with Galen that it is admirable and good for PTFS to release Harley. They have the thanks of a grateful global community for it. Many libraries will benefit from the great features and fixes, once they are integrated into our upcoming official releases of 3.2 and 3.4. What I disagree with, wholeheartedly, is PTFS claiming that Harley (available at http://www.liblime.com/downloads) is an official release. Is it an official PTFS release? Yes! Is it an official Koha Library Software release? No. Are we grateful and appreciative of all of the effort, time, and money put in to developing this release? Of course! Is it an official, community vetted release of Koha Library Software? No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to point out that koha.org is no longer the official website of the Koha Library Software project. The Koha Library Software project does not post official releases at koha.org anymore, the reasons why have been stated on the official website: <a href="http://koha-community.org/home/" rel="nofollow">http://koha-community.org/home/</a>.</p>
<p>I agree with Galen that it is admirable and good for PTFS to release Harley. They have the thanks of a grateful global community for it. Many libraries will benefit from the great features and fixes, once they are integrated into our upcoming official releases of 3.2 and 3.4. What I disagree with, wholeheartedly, is PTFS claiming that Harley (available at <a href="http://www.liblime.com/downloads)" rel="nofollow">http://www.liblime.com/downloads)</a> is an official release. Is it an official PTFS release? Yes! Is it an official Koha Library Software release? No. Are we grateful and appreciative of all of the effort, time, and money put in to developing this release? Of course! Is it an official, community vetted release of Koha Library Software? No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Database server disk space usage in Evergreen by Galen Charlton</title>
		<link>http://galencharlton.com/blog/?p=36&#038;cpage=1#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Galen Charlton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 14:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://galencharlton.com/blog/?p=36#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Indeed.  Auto-generated authority records are missing the point, and I generally want to remove them during migration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed.  Auto-generated authority records are missing the point, and I generally want to remove them during migration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Database server disk space usage in Evergreen by George Duimovich</title>
		<link>http://galencharlton.com/blog/?p=36&#038;cpage=1#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>George Duimovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 14:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://galencharlton.com/blog/?p=36#comment-236</guid>
		<description>Thanks Galen! Very useful. 

In our case, I see that authority.full_rec is the second largest table, and I suspect because one of the earlier systems (pre-Unicorn) we were on had some kind of automatic authority addition capability that may have been triggered during a previous migration from what I&#039;m told. Oh joy, the things one finds out when you migrate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Galen! Very useful. </p>
<p>In our case, I see that authority.full_rec is the second largest table, and I suspect because one of the earlier systems (pre-Unicorn) we were on had some kind of automatic authority addition capability that may have been triggered during a previous migration from what I&#8217;m told. Oh joy, the things one finds out when you migrate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
